Friday, October 29, 2010

FREE guitar cabinet impulse responses!

Not satisfied with your amp cab sounds?  Replace em!

Free Redwirez IR Library • Marshall 1960A • Celestion G12M-25s


Ah, the legendary Marshall 1960A. Pretty, ain't it? With its grill-cloth glistening in the bar-light as this beast muscles out power chords in an amaranthine haze of smoke, hot lights and adoring fans... this cab positively reeks of rock... the raucous, beer-soaked, unapologetic kind. Oh, and it sounds great, too.

It was the first cab we ever sampled and is still one of our favorites, so it seems fitting to release these IRs into the wild on Redwirez' birthday.

I know... we had you at "FREE" but here are some highlights just the same:
  • Loaded with four, well-traveled 25-watt Celestion G12M "Greenbacks"
  • 17 industry standard mics, so explore countless tonal possibilities:
  • AKG C414B-ULS
    Audix D6
    Audix i5
    Beyerdynamic M160
    Coles 4038
    Electrovoice RE20
    Heil PR30
    Neumann KM84
    Neumann U47
    Neumann U67
    Neumann U87
    Royer R121
    Sennheiser MD409
    Sennheiser MD421
    Shure SM57
    Shure SM7
    TAB-Funkenwerk SM57

http://www.redwirez.com/free1960g12m25s.jsp?ref=home

http://www.redwirez.com/

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Sunday, October 24, 2010

The Devil's Blood Promo Video & Interview

Dutch occult rock act The Devil's Blood has posted a new promo trailer in support of the debut album "The Time of No Time Evermore," which features live footage of the band and commentary from founder and guitarist SL. The video clip can be viewed below. "The Time of No Time Evermore" was released in North America on May 25th, 2010.





Interview source:   http://www.metalunderground.com/news/details.cfm?newsid=56251

Dutch act The Devil's Blood has more in common with Blue Oyster Cult than with Emperor, yet somehow this Satanic rock and roll band has managed to grab the attention of fans of the most underground extreme metal. The group's first full-length celebration of the left hand path, "The Time Of No Time Evermore," saw its North American release this month, and The Devil's Blood is currently gearing up to bring their unholy sermons to the European festival circuit.

Discussing the recording process for the album, main song writer and guitarist SL commented, "A lot more time was available for us to explore the furthest depths of the material and to make sure there would be no detail unpronounced. It was a grueling schedule but that is exactly the type of situation you need to translate damnation into art." SL went on to discuss the truth behind every fan's interpretations of the album's lyrics and shared some thoughts on major occult figures.

xFiruath: Where did you record “The Time of No Time Evermore” and how were the recording sessions?

SL: We entered The Void Studios in Eindhoven, The Netherlands on the first of April in 2009 and worked for about 40 days. The sessions went very well. A lot more time was available for us to explore the furthest depths of the material and to make sure there would be no detail unpronounced. It was a grueling schedule but that is exactly the type of situation you need to translate damnation into art.
xFiruath: How has your sound changed from your earlier demos to your full-length album?

SL: Every release had its own aesthetic and atmosphere. This is something the song, or rather the theme of the songs, dictates. Things also evolve due to a growth in professionalism and a clearer perspective and creative drive. A maturing process of sorts. We will never release the same thing twice when it comes to song writing and we will always let the songs decide how they should sound.
xFiruath: Obviously the lyrics deal with the devil, but what are the specific lyrical themes on the album?

SL: I would suggest you read and listen. It is unwise for a poet to explain his poetry. Each interpretation is correct in the frame of reference that brought it on. No truth exists but the truth experienced. A completely subjective power of creation and destruction.
xFiruath: Despite having a more “rock and roll” oriented sound you guys have managed to get the attention of fans of black metal and death metal. How do you think your music managed to catch their attention and how do you feel about being idolized by a group of people who normally don’t care for more “mellow” music?

SL: This is not really for me to say but I think it might have something to do with our spiritual nature. Black metal fans might have an inherent inclination towards left hand path energies. This does not count for the majority of fans though, and like many other scenes they might simply like us because they enjoy good music; which we also offer.
xFiruath: Have you ever considered using any of the conventions of more extreme metal in your music, like growls or heavy distorted guitars?

SL: We have.
xFiruath: As a band with clear influences from Satanism I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts about figures like Anton LaVey and Aleister Crowely, who tend to be polarizing figures in the occult world.

SL: Neither of whom where Satanists in any form that I could see. I have great deal of respect for Aleister Crowley and read his work regularly. There is much to be found in his work which is of great value for all interested in the occult. LaVey is nothing but a humanist trying to get people focused on themselves by praying to themselves. This is absolutely nothing to with the worship of the God of the left hand path. Satanism is for me the worship of death and chaos. All that which seeks to break free of bounds. A gateway to total freedom.
xFiruath: Are there any plans for upcoming tour dates?

SL: We are currently preparing for a number of festival appearances throughout the summer in Europe. Also we will be appearing in Calgary, Canada for the Noctis festival in September.
xFiruath: Have your lyrics and overall theme ever caused you any problems with the crowd or getting shows booked?

SL: No, quite the contrary, things have been growing for us at an alarming rate. All opposition will be swept aside.
xFiruath: What bands do you personally listen to in your free time?

SL: I listen to a lot of different musical styles; everything from rock to black metal to classical music and roots music. I enjoy music as I enjoy art; always looking for new interesting interpretations and inspirations.
xFiruath: Anything else you’d like to discuss?

SL: Thank for your attention and we hope to plague your dreams with our poison for a long, long time.

Katatonia - "Tonight's Music"

Saturday, October 23, 2010

How do I connect my subwoofers to my mixer?


“How do I connect my powered subs ( I think my powered subs already have a built-in crossover) to my mixer? Through the auxiliary or main output?”
(We will presume here that the subwoofers have internal power amplifiers, as it makes the explanation simpler. The same would apply however if the power amplifiers were external, it's just a little more hooking up to do.)

Your question does not specify whether you are using your subs for monitoring in the studio, or for live sound. Let's assume for now that you are in the studio.

We do not recommend connecting the subwoofers directly to the mixing console in any way.

The reason for this is that every studio needs a monitoring system that above every other factor is consistent. It's nice to have a wide frequency range, nice to have low distortion, nice that it goes loud enough.

But all the other factors take second and progressively lesser places in comparison with consistency. If your monitoring is the same from day to day, you can learn to work around any imperfections. And since no monitor system is perfect, this will always be the case.

If your monitoring changes from day to day, then really you won't have a clue what you are listening to and your mixes will be dreadful.
So the only possible reason for connecting the subs to the mixing console would be so that you could make adjustments, and that is precisely what you should not be doing at the console in the studio.

All adjustments to the monitoring system should be done among the crossovers, amplifiers and loudspeakers - nowhere else. You should take as much time as you need to optimize your monitoring. And once you have decided on the best settings, leave it alone!

Setting up a subwoofer system is easier than it used to be.

In the 'olden days' the monitor output from the mixing console would connect to a crossover that would separate the mid and high frequencies, which would go to the power amplifiers for the main monitors, and the low frequencies, which go to the subs.

These days, the crossover is more likely to be built into the subwoofer. Take for an example the Wharfedale EVP-X18PB. This has a single 18 inch drive unit powered by a 400 watt amplifier.

In addition however it has connections for the left and right stereo signals from the monitor output of the mixing console. These lead internally to a crossover that separates the lows from the mids and highs.

The mids and highs go to two outputs, which you can then connect to the amps driving your main monitor loudspeakers.

The lows from the two channels are summed and are used to drive the sub. The sub has a level control so that you can blend it with the output of your main monitors. There is a phase switch too - to test this put the speakers close together, and use the setting where you hear the most bass.

Combining the two channels into one sub is a useable option. Low frequencies are not particularly directional. Of course it's better to use two subs if you can afford it.

The key to using subs successfully for monitoring is to match the output from the main monitors and the subs at the crossover frequency. This is difficult to do unless you have an acoustic level meter, but if you play the subs on their own and listen to the highest frequencies they produce, then lock these frequencies in your head and listen out for them when all of the monitors are playing. Balance the sub(s) so that this band of frequencies is at the same subjective level as all the other frequencies.

Live Sound

Although in theory in live sound it would be nice to think of the main speaker stacks as gigantic hi-fi speakers, in practice there are benefits to be gained from subjective optimization from venue to venue. For a fixed installation, studio practice as described above applies. For a traveling PA, then you can either do it the 'proper' way, or connect the subs to the console so that you can tweak the sound more easily.



source:   http://www.audiomasterclass.com/question-time/index.php?p=how-do-i-connect-my-subwoofers-to-my-mixer&a=52

Thursday, October 21, 2010

POD HD500 in action!

Glenn DeLaune is an amazing dude when it comes to using guitar amp modeling technology, as evidenced by his AMAZING tutorials he's done with the BOSS GT-10, Line 6 POD X3 Live, and now, the POD HD500:

Monday, October 18, 2010

Angel Witch - "Angel Witch"

another long lost classic from the AMAZING NWOBHM era...







 

Iron Maiden may have come out at the top of the heap - and deservedly so - but they weren't the only ones from that scene that totally kicked ass.  Yup, even Def Leppard had balls back then... before Mutt Lange emasculated em. *rolls eyes*

Monday, October 11, 2010

Saturday, October 9, 2010

the myth of 'tone suck'

The following graphic shows the sound frequency levels of a BOSS GT-10 multi-fx board, a true-bypass stompbox(off), and a computer's soundcard all by itself, i.e., nothing going on at all...






So basically - as you can see in plain view right here - unless you're using complete shit cables, or your gear is broken, there is virtually NO DIFFERENCE whatsoever... in fact, the only notable difference is waaaay down around 30hz - which the majority of people can't even hear.  So quit worrying about all the CRAP you read in online guitar forums and stop making things more difficult than they are!

GO PLAY YER DAMN GUITAR!

Nile - "Kafir!" LIVE in New York City


http://www.nile-catacombs.net/

http://www.myspace.com/nilecatacombs

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

The Case Against True Bypass by Pete Cornish


"Hey Pete, do you use True Bypass?"

Look out there's a lecture coming:

The "true bypass" function, which is promoted by some, can create dreadful problems with a system that uses many pedals. Take for instance a 15 ft guitar cable linked to ten pedals, each linked by a 2 ft cable, and then onto the amp by a 30 ft cable. If all pedals have "true bypass", and are off, then the total cable length hanging on the guitar output will be 63 ft. This will cause a huge loss of tone and signal level particularly if the guitar is a vintage type with low output and high impedance. The amp volume is then turned up and the treble control increased to compensate for the losses. The inherent background noise now increases by the amount of the gain and treble increase and is usually, in my experience, too bad for serious work. If one of the pedals is now switched on, then it's (hopefully) high input impedance (and usually low output impedance) will buffer all the output cables from the guitar and the signal level will rise due to the removal of some of the load on the pickups (i.e.: 17 ft instead of 63 ft of cable). The treble will rise and the tone and volume will not be as before. If that pedal was say a chorus or delay, devices which are usually unity gain, then your overall signal level and tone will vary each time an effect is added...not a very good idea.

Some pedals have an input impedance which is far from high in real terms; the input impedance of the vast majority of amps is 1 Megohm (one million ohms) and in my experience there are few effects pedals that have the same input impedance. A load on the guitar of less than 1 Megohm will reduce the volume and high frequency content of the pickup signal thus giving rise to complaints that "this pedal looses tone/volume" etc. Many effects I have tested have an input impedance of less than 100 Kilohms (ie: only one tenth of the amp input impedance) and cause serious signal losses in the effects chain.

My system, which I devised in the early 70's, is to feed the guitar into a fixed high impedance load, which is identical to the amp input, and then distribute the signal to the various effects and amps by low impedance buffered feeds. This gives a constant signal level and tonal characteristics, which do not change at all when effects are added. The proof that this works are in the recordings of our clients: Roxy Music; The Police; Queen; Pink Floyd; Bryan Adams; Lou Reed; Dire Straits; Paul McCartney; Sting; Jimmy Page; Judas Priest; Black Sabbath....

So the answer to your question re "true bypass" is no, I do not use this system in my Effects Boards/Racks as it can seriously degrade your sound. All my current effects pedals (excluding Vintage Series) which are derived from our large systems have, as the main input stage, a fiendishly clever pre amp that has the same characteristics as the input of a tube amp (1 Megohm/20pF), a highly efficient filter to eliminate the possibility of radio breakthrough and a low output impedance so that any following pedals/ cables etc. will not impose a load on the guitar signal. This pre amp is fitted to all our large stage systems and has always met with huge approval; not only from the guitarist but also the PA operator who is so happy to have constant level and tone presented to his mixing board. I go further with large systems and provide several inputs, each with the isolating pre amp and a gain compensation pre amp so that many different guitars can be level matched into the system. In addition a 20 segment PPM type display provides visual indication of signal level in our Effects Boards and Rack Systems.

©Pete Cornish 2003